Most facilities today are a mix of analog and digital source
equipment. The ongoing push is toward increased maintenance of the
digital signal path. Regardless of the compliment of analog and digital
equipment, every station's goal is to maintain a quality audio signal
through the entire chain.
Several basic audio quality parameters are common to both forms of
audio transmission. The tools for most of the analog methods are
familiar to stations. However, the tools required for digital
evaluation may be less familiar, and the elements to be measured may
also introduce new concepts and methods.
Computer-based systems provide accurate
test routines that can be repeated and automated.
Reliable and proven
The analog audio test set has faithfully served radio for many
years. Basic measurements such as frequency response, distortion and
noise are simple elements to evaluate. The signal generator and audio
analyzer are necessary tools for these tasks.
Analog signals are subject to the medium through which they travel,
and the parameters can sometimes explain what may affect that
Bench-top test sets can provide highly accurate measurements of
these parameters. These same bench-top systems have evolved into
portable forms as well. Creating a test scenario with large boxes, once
an awkward task, has been reduced to plugging in a device that can be
as small as a PDA. The cables and connectors now occupy more space than
the test equipment itself.
Analog testing is still an important task. Even through a completely
digital system, the final output of the digital-to-analog converter is
an analog source and needs to be evaluated from an analog point of
When digital test sets were first introduced, one of their obvious
attributes was how much time a user could save by automating many of
the functions in routine tests. The tedious task of nulling the test
set between each frequency measurement is now done automatically. The
entire discrete frequency series is done in one continuous sweep or
with a broadband noise source.
Digitally-based systems can run automatically, while the engineer
attends to other duties. For intermittent problems, the test set
monitors several parameters at once until the failure the occurs,
providing more information to the person performing the trouble
shooting. At the same time, that person does not have to sit and wait
for an intermittent problem to occur before he can diagnose a
Smaller, portable test units pack lots
of features in a small case.
Not always perfect
Digital systems were designed to eliminate the problems and
shortcomings of the transmission medium and processing path. Each
amplifier in an analog system introduces a small variation to a signal,
whether it is noise, distortion or frequency response. The theory
behind digital is that what comes out is exactly the same as what goes
in. This is not always the case. While digital systems can be more
robust than their analog counterparts, they can also be more
In most cases, analog signals fail because of a slow decay.
Regularly checking and recording operating parameters can show that a
problem is developing before it becomes serious. In a digital system,
the failure may go unnoticed until it is too late. Occasionally, chirps
or clicks in the audio can be a sign that something is not right, but
when failure occurs, it occurs immediately.
Which to choose?
Like any other equipment decision, deciding on a system first
requires that you determine your needs. Most of the available audio
test instruments can be categorized by several functions.
Analog or digital This is the most basic consideration.
Choose a compliment of analog and digital inputs and outputs. The
digital connections may include more than one format (AES-3 and S/PDIF
for example) and variable sampling rates.
Generator or analyzer Some units feature one function or the
other, and some offer both. For stand-alone equipment tests, the
generator and analyzer combination would work well. For system checks,
where the input and output are separated by some distance, separate
components would work better.
Basic functions or feature-rich This is the most complex area
of concern. Each available product fills its own special niche. The
ability to read bit errors and the amount of jitter may be important
for one application, while simply knowing the sampling rate with an
overall digital quality indication may be enough for another
The range of test equipment is broad enough to provide a workable
system for any need. Even with the latest digital equipment, where a
field repair at the component level may not be possible, the right test
equipment can help to diagnose the complexity of a problem and aid the
decision on how best to correct the situation.
New terms, new tools
Testing and measuring analog audio has its own set of traditional
measurements that are used to verify a signal's quality. Some of these
measurements apply to digital audio, but simply knowing that there is a
problem is not enough. Sometimes, distortion and other problems can be
traced to a problem in the digital bitstream. Here are some of the
common digital terms and their meanings.
bit-error rate or bit-error ratio (BER) A measurement of
errors in a bit stream. The ratio is calculated by dividing the number
of erroneous bits by the total number of bits transmitted, received or
processed over a specified period. This can also express the number of
bits processed before an erroneous bit is found.
bit-rate The rate of transfer of a digital signal. A signal's
bit rate is determined by multiplying the sampling rate by the number
of bits in the sample by the number of channels. For example, an audio
CD is sampled at 44.1kHz with a 16-bit resolution and has two audio
channels (stereo). The bit-rate of a CD is 44,1000 × 16 × 2 =
jitter An error in accuracy of a digitally clocked signal,
which appears as an unexpected phase shift in the signal. Jitter
happens when a data transition does not occur at exactly the
anticipated point of a clock pulse.
latency The inherent delay in signal processing and software
processing. Latency is determined by the time it takes for a system or
device to respond to an instruction, or the time it takes for a signal
to pass through a device. To most people, a system latency of less than
35ms is not recognized as an actual delay.